Revue narrative sur l’agentivité des acteurs et actrices du supérieur en situation d’innovation
Mots-clés :
agentivité, agentivité collective, innovation, enseignement supérieur, revue narrativeRésumé
Les transformations des organisations éducatives exigent une adaptation continue des pratiques. Dans ce contexte, l’agentivité, soit la capacité d’agir sur les environnements et de les transformer, joue un rôle clé dans le développement organisationnel et l’innovation. Malgré l’abondance des travaux sur l’agentivité en éducation, peu d’études examinent sa relation avec l’amélioration organisationnelle en enseignement supérieur et le rôle des différents acteurs impliqués. Une revue narrative réalisée à l’automne 2022 a recensé 46 articles portant sur des contextes d’innovation en enseignement supérieur où l’agentivité est documentée. L’analyse a permis de dégager cinq thèmes liés à ses retombées et de formuler des pistes et recommandations pour soutenir son émergence en enseignement supérieur.
Références
Veuillez noter : dans la liste de références, les références précédées d’un astérisque désignent les articles retenus et analysés dans le cadre de la recension des écrits.
Amog, K., Pham, B., Courvoisier, M., Mak, M., Booth, A., Godfrey, C., Hwee, J., Straus, S. E. et Tricco, A. C. (2022). The web-based “Right Review” tool asks reviewers simple questions to suggest methods from 41 knowledge synthesis methods. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 147, 42‑51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.03.004
*Annala, J., Mäkinen, M., Lindén, J. et Henriksson, J. (2022). Change and stability in academic agency in higher education curriculum reform. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 54(1), 53‑69.
Baron, C. (2007). Une investigation collaborative et développementale de l’expérience du pouvoir chez les gestionnaires postconventionnels. Dans M. Anadon (Éd.), Recherche participative : multiples regards (1re éd.). (pp. 125-128). Presses de l’Université du Québec. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv18ph9tc
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman and Company.
Bandura, A. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(3), 75‑78. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00064
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1-26. https://www.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
Biesta, G. et Tedder, M. (2007). Agency and learning in the lifecourse: Towards an ecological perspective. Studies in the Education of Adults, 39(2), 132‑149.
Brew, A., Boud, D., Crawford, K. et Lucas, L. (2018). Navigating the demands of academic work to shape an academic job. Studies in Higher Education, 43(12), 2294‑2304.
*Brodie, K. (2021). Teacher agency in professional learning communities. Professional Development in Education, 47(4), 560‑573. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1689523
*Cai, Y. et Lönnqvist, A. (2021). Overcoming the barriers to establishing interdisciplinary degree programmes : the perspective of managing organisational innovation. Higher Education Policy, 35(4), 1‑23.
*Chang, S. (2021). Supporting expansive learning in preservice bilingual teachers’ zone of proximal development of the activity system: An analysis of a four-field model trajectory. Professional Development in Education, 47(2‑3), 225‑242.
*Chang, S., Torres-Guzmán, M. E. et Waring, H. Z. (2020). Experiencing critical language awareness as a collective struggle: Methodological innovations in language awareness workshops. Language Learning Journal, 48(3), 356‑369.
*Charteris, J. et Smardon, D. (2019). Democratic contribution or information for reform? Prevailing and emerging discourses of student voice. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 44(6), 1‑18.
*Cheng, J. et Wei, L. (2021). Individual agency and changing language education policy in China: Reactions to the new « Guidelines on College English Teaching ». Current Issues in Language Planning, 22(1/2), 117‑135.
*Clarke, S. et Dempster, N. (2020). Leadership learning: The pessimism of complexity and the optimism of personal agency. Professional Development in Education, 46(4), 711‑727. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2020.1787196
*Clavert, M., Löfström, E., Niemi, H. et Nevgi, A. (2018). Change agency as a way of promoting pedagogical development in academic communities: A longitudinal study. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(8), 945‑962.
Cole, M. et Engeström, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. Dans G. Salomon (Éd.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations, (pp. 1‑46). Cambridge University Press.
Cong-Lem, N. (2021). Teacher agency: A systematic review of international literature. 31(3), 718‑738.
*Costa, C., Murphy, M., Pereira, A. L. et Taylor, Y. (2018). Higher education students’ experiences of digital learning and (dis)empowerment. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(3), 140‑152.
*Dann, R., Basford, J., Booth, C., O’Sullivan, R., Scanlon, J., Woodfine, C. et Wright, P. (2019). The impact of doctoral study on university lecturers’ construction of self within a changing higher education policy context. Studies in Higher Education, 44(7), 1166‑1182.
Deschênes, M. (2021). Les systèmes de recommandations pour soutenir l’agentivité des enseignantes et des enseignants au collégial dans leur développement professionnel [thèse de doctorat, Université Laval]. CorupusUL. https://corpus.ulaval.ca/jspui/bitstream/20.500.11794/68072/1/36790.pdf
Deschênes, M. et Parent, S. (2022). Methodology to study teacher agency: A systematic review of the literature. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(4), 2459‑2476. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.4.2459
*Du, X., Lundberg, A., Ayari, M. A., Naji, K. K. et Hawari, A. (2022). Examining engineering students’ perceptions of learner agency enactment in problem‐ and project‐based learning using Q methodology. Journal of Engineering Education, 111(1), 111‑136. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20430
Edwards, A. (2005). Relational agency: Learning to be a resourceful practitioner. International journal of educational research, 43(3), 168‑182.
Engeström, Y. et Sannino, A. (2013). La volition et l’agentivité transformatrice: perspective théorique de l’activité. Revue internationale du CRIRES: innover dans la tradition de Vygotsky, 1(1), 4-19.
*Englund, C. et Price, L. (2018). Facilitating agency: The change laboratory as an intervention for collaborative sustainable development in higher education. International Journal for Academic Development, 23(3), 192‑205.
Eteläpelto, A., Vähäsantanen, K., Hökkä, P. et Paloniemi, S. (2013). What is agency? Conceptualizing professional agency at work. Educational Research Review, 10, 45‑65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.05.001
Glaés-Coutts, L. (2020). University-supported networks as professional development for teachers in school-age educare. International Journal for Research on Extended Education, 8(1), 66‑79.
*Haubrick, J., Levy, D. et Cruz, L. (2021). Developing peer review of instruction in an online master course model. Online Learning, 25(3), 313‑328.
*Hemson, C. (2018). Agency, resilience and innovation in overcoming educational failure. Perspectives in Education, 36(2), 61‑74.
*Hero, L.-M. et Lindfors, E. (2019). Students’ learning experience in a multidisciplinary innovation project. Education + Training, 61(4), 500‑522.
Hökkä, P., Rautiainen, M., Silander, T. et Eteläpelto, A. (2019). Collective agency-promoting leadership in finnish teacher education. Dans J. Murray, A. Swennen et C. Kosnik (Éds.), International Research, Policy and Practice in Teacher Education (pp. 15-29). Springer.
Hökkä, P., Vähäsantanen, K. et Mahlakaarto, S. (2017). Teacher educators’ collective professional agency and identity – Transforming marginality to strength. Teaching & Teacher Education, 63, 36‑46.
Hombourger-Barès, S., Pelletier, P., Simard, C. et Moulet, L. (2022). L’innovation d’un MOOC en sciences de gestion : vers une approche systémique basée sur la co-création de valeur entre acteurs. Revue internationale de pédagogie de l’enseignement supérieur, 38(3), [En ligne]. https://doi.org/10.4000/ripes.4248
*Honkimäki, S. et Tynjälä, P. (2018). Prerequisites for the successful group mentoring of first-year university students : A case study. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 26(2), 148‑164.
*Idahosa, G. E. (2020). Dirty body politics: Habitus, gendered embodiment, and the resistance to women’s agency in transforming South African higher education. Gender, Work & Organization, 27(6), 988‑1003.
Kajamaa, A. et Kumpulainen, K. (2019). Agency in the making: Analyzing students’ transformative agency in a school-based makerspace. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 26(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2019.1647547
*Liera, R. et Dowd, A. C. (2019). Faculty learning at boundaries to broker racial equity. Journal of Higher Education, 90(3), 462‑485.
Liller, K. D., Yang, Y. et Lim, A. (2021). The activist lab and the MOULA program. Health Promotion Practice, 22(2), 174‑176.
*Lucas, P., Wilkinson, H., Rae, S., Dean, B. A. et Eady, M. J. (2021). Knowing me, knowing you : Humanitas in work-integrated learning during adversity. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 18(7), 159‑174.
*Mann, L., Chang, R., Chandrasekaran, S., Coddington, A., Daniel, S., Cook, E., Crossin, E., Cosson, B., Turner, J., Mazzurco, A., Dohaney, J., O’Hanlon, T., Pickering, J., Walker, S., Maclean, F. et Smith, T. D. (2021). From problem-based learning to practice-based education : A framework for shaping future engineers. European Journal of Engineering Education, 46(1), 27‑47.
*Mathieson, S. (2019). Integrating research, teaching and practice in the context of new institutional policies: A social practice approach. Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education Research, 78(5), 799‑815.
*McGrath, C. (2020). Academic developers as brokers of change: Insights from a research project on change practice and agency. International Journal for Academic Development, 25(2), 94‑106. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2019.1665524
*Neufeld, P. G. et Delcore, H. D. (2018). « Situatedness » and variations in student adoption of technology practices: Towards a critical techno-pedagogy. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 17, 1‑38.
Paillé, P. et Mucchielli, A. (2021). L’analyse qualitative en sciences humaines et sociales-5e éd. Armand Colin.
Pantić, N. et Florian, L. (2015). Developing teachers as agents of inclusion and social justice. Education Inquiry, 6(3), 27311.
Paquelin, D. (2020). Innovation dans l’enseignement supérieur : Des modèles aux pratiques, quels principes retenir? Enjeux et société, 7(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.7202/1073359ar
Parent, S. (2017). L’engagement d’enseignants, la variation de l’engagement d’étudiants sur une base trimestrielle et la présence de conditions d’innovation en situation d’enseigner et d’apprendre avec le numérique au collégial [Thèse de doctorat]. Université Laval.
*Pearson, J. (2017). Processfolio: Uniting academic literacies and critical emancipatory action research for practitioner-led inquiry into EAP writing assessment. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 14(2‑3), 158‑181.
*Peng, Y. et Pyper, J. S. (2021). Finding success with pedagogical innovation: A case from CSL teachers’ experiences with TBLT. Language Teaching Research, 25(4), 633‑655. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168819862132
Priestley, M., Priestley, M. R., Biesta, G. et Robinson, S. (2015). Teacher agency: An ecological approach. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Raynault, A., Simard-St-Pierre, E., Danis, S. et Béchard, J.-P. (2023). Ensemble pour la réussite étudiante en enseignement supérieur : Accroître notre capacité à collaborer et à agir (guide pour la cocréation de laboratoires d’apprentissage et laboratoires vivants ou autres projets d’innovation pédagogique). Chaire de leadership en enseignement en design pédagogique et technologie éducative. https://cle-dpte.chaire.ulaval.ca/app/uploads/2023/09/Guide_CLE_DPTE-2.pdf
Reeve, J. (2013). How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: The concept of agentic engagement. Journal of educational psychology, 105(3), 579.
Reeve, J. et Shin, S. H. (2020). How teachers can support students’ agentic engagement. Theory Into Practice, 59(2), 150‑161.
*Reyes, V., Jr., Clancy, S., Koge, H., Richardson, K. et Taylor, P. (2021). Decolonising globalised curriculum landscapes: The identity and agency of academics. London Review of Education, 19(1).
*Rincón-Ussa, L. J., Fandiño-Parra, Y. J. et Cortés-Ibañez, A. M. (2020). Educational innovation through ict-mediated learning strategies in the initial teacher education of english language teachers. GIST Education and Learning Research Journal, 21, 91‑117.
*Ruan, X., Zheng, X. et Toom, A. (2020). From perceived discrepancies to intentional efforts : Understanding English department teachers’ agency in classroom instruction in a changing curricular landscape. Teaching & Teacher Education, 92, 1-15.
*Sankey, M. D. (2022). The state of Australasian online higher education post-pandemic and beyond. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 19(2), 14‑26.
*Sapir, A. (2022). Negotiating a dual deficit: The work of student support between conservative audacity and tempered radicalism. Studies in Higher Education, 47(7), 1440‑1452.
Spillane, J. P. et Diamond, J. B. (2007). Distributed leadership in practice. Teachers College, Columbia University New York.
Stelma, J. et Fay, R. (2014). Intentionality and developing researcher competence on a UK master’s course: An ecological perspective on research education. Studies in Higher Education, 39(4), 517‑533.
Stetsenko, A. (2019). Radical-transformative agency: Continuities and contrasts with relational agency and implications for education. Frontiers in Education, 4, 148. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00148
*Tao, J. et Gao, X. (2017). Teacher agency and identity commitment in curricular reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 346‑355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.01.010
Tierney, W. G. et Lanford, M. (2016). Conceptualizing Innovation in higher education. Dans M. B. Paulsen (Éd.), Higher Education : Handbook of Theory and Research (vol. 31, p. 1‑40). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26829-3_1
Tilak, J. B. (2012). Marchandisation de l’enseignement supérieur l’impact de l’Accord général sur le commerce des services (AGCS). Principes de la planification de l’éducation; 95.
*Tran, H. (2019). Teacher agency in times of educational change: The case of transitioned teachers in Vietnam. Current Issues in Language Planning, 20(5), 544‑559. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2018.1553912
*Trede, F., Goodyear, P., Macfarlane, S., Markauskaite, L., McEwen, C. et Tayebjee, F. (2017). Learning in hybrid spaces designing a mobile technology capacity building framework for workplace learning. International Perspectives on Education & Society, 32, 83‑97.
*Ursin, J., Vähäsantanen, K., McAlpine, L. et Hökkä, P. (2020). Emotionally loaded identity and agency in Finnish academic work. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(3), 311‑325. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2018.1541971
Vähäsantanen, K. (2015). Professional agency in the stream of change: Understanding educational change and teachers’ professional identities. Teaching and teacher education, 47, 1‑12.
*Vähäsantanen, K., Hökkä, P., Paloniemi, S., Herranen, S. et Eteläpelto, A. (2017a). Professional learning and agency in an identity coaching programme. Professional Development in Education, 43(4), 514‑536.
Vähäsantanen, K., Paloniemi, S., Hökkä, P. K. et Eteläpelto, A. (2017b). An Agency-Promoting Learning Arena for Developing Shared Work Practices. Dans M. Goller & S. Paloniemi (Éds.), Agency at work : An agentic perspective on professional learning and development (p. 351‑371). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60943-0_18
Vähäsantanen, K., Paloniemi, S., Räikkönen, E. et Hökkä, P. (2020). Professional agency in a university context : Academic freedom and fetters. Teaching and Teacher Education, 89, 1‑12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.103000
*van de Heyde, V., Stoltenkamp, J. et Siebrits, A. (2017). Designing a social work online self-coaching program : Integrated support and joint ownership. Cogent Education, 4(1), 1346547. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1346547
*van Krieken Robson, J. et Zanatta, F. (2022). Navigating pedagogical challenges through authentic pedagogy during the transition to online learning amid COVID-19. Widening Participation & Lifelong Learning, 24(2), 83‑93.
Voogt, J., Laferrière, T., Breuleux, A., Itow, R. C., Hickey, D. T. et McKenney, S. (2015). Collaborative design as a form of professional development. Instructional Science, 43(2), 259‑282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-014-9340-7
*Walker, M. et Loots, S. (2018). Transformative change in higher education through participatory action research: A capabilities analysis. Educational Action Research, 26(1), 166‑181.
*Walwyn, D. R. et Combrinck, C. (2021). Epistemic justice during a global pandemic: Transforming curricula and pedagogical practices to improve student experiences of innovation studies. Industry and Higher Education, 35(5), 598‑608.
*Wang, M. (2021). Satellite Baby Students’ Lived Experiences, TESOL Teacher Candidates’ Positioning, Agency, and Pedagogy. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 18(1), 41‑64.
*Yakovleva, O. V. et Kulikova, S. S. (2022). Educational behaviour and student agency in personalised digital learning. Образовательное поведение и агентность студентов в персонализированном цифровой обучении, 58(4), 160‑172.
*Yang, H. et Clarke, M. (2018). Spaces of agency within contextual constraints: A case study of teacher’s response to EFL reform in a Chinese university. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 38(2), 187‑201.
*Youssef, R. M. et Shukri, N. (2018). EFL teachers’ response to the ecological expectations of the teaching context at a Saudi university. International Journal of Education and Practice, 6(1), 1‑13.
*Zheng, G., Cai, Y. et Ma, S. (2017). Towards an analytical framework for understanding the development of a quality assurance system in an international joint programme. European Journal of Higher Education, 7(3), 243‑260.
*Zhou, J. et Deneen, C. (2020). « Sandwiched » or « filtering’: Middle leaders » agency in innovation enactment. Journal of Higher Education Policy & Management, 42(3), 332‑346.
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
(c) Tous droits réservés Revue des sciences de l'éducation de McGill / McGill Journal of Education 2026
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International.
