Supporting self-regulated learning in a secondary applied mathematics course
Keywords:
self-regulated learning, self-regulated learning classroom support, secondary mathematics, motivational beliefs, metacognitionAbstract
This study examines how one teacher supported low-achieving students’ self-regulated learning (SRL) in the context of a secondary mathematics class. The teacher’s scaffolding provided students with multiple opportunities to use feedback and adapt learning and study strategies. Data compared pre- and postmeasures of metacognitive skills, motivational beliefs, and learning and study behaviours, and examined the effects of directed practice on students’ developing SRL as well as their mathematics achievement. Results suggest the need for more research into the effects of individualized, targeted supports, particularly in assisting students in using metacognitive feedback to adapt learning strategies.
References
Ahmed, W., van der Werf, G., Kuyper, H. & Minnaert, A. (2012). Emotions, self-regulated learning, and achievement in mathematics: A growth curve analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(1), 150-161. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030160
Allen, G. J., Lerner, W. M., & Hinrichsen, J. J. (1972). Study behaviors and their relationships to test anxiety and academic performance. Psychological Reports, 30(2), 407-410. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1972.30.2.407
Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44(9), 1175- 1184. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.9.1175
Barab, S. (2006). Design-based research: A methodological toolkit for the learning scientist. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp 153-169). Cambridge University Press.
Blair, C., & Razza, R.P. (2007). Relating effortful control, executive function, and false belief understanding to emerging math and literacy ability in kindergarten. Child Development, 78(2), 647-663. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01019.x
Boaler, J. (2015). Mathematical mindsets: Unleashing students' potential through creative math, inspiring messages and innovative teaching. John Wiley & Sons.
Butler, D. L., Beckingham, B., & Lauscher, H. J. N. (2005). Promoting strategic learning by eighth-grade students struggling in mathematics: A report of three case studies. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 20(3), 156-174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2005.00130.x
Butler, D. L., Schnellert, L., & Cartier, S. C. (2013). Layers of self- and co-regulation: Teachers working collaboratively to support adolescents’ self-regulated learning through reading. Education Research International, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/845694
Butler, D. L., Schnellert, L., Perry, N. E. (2017). Developing Self-regulating Learners. Pearson Canada.
Butler, D. (1994). From learning strategies to strategic learning: Promoting self-regulated learning by postsecondary students with learning disabilities. Canadian Journal of Special Education, 9(4), 69-101.
Butler, D. & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245-281. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543065003245
Buzza, D. (2013). Supporting students in the transition to high school: The role of self-regulated learning. In S. E. Elliott-Johns & D. H. Jarvis, Perspectives on Transitions in Schooling and Instructional Practice (pp. 215-241). University of Toronto Press.
Buzza, D. & Dol, M. (2015). Goal setting support in alternative math classes: Effects on motivation and engagement. Exceptionality Education International, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.5206/eei.v25i1.7716
Cleary, T. J. (2006). The development and validation of the Self-Regulation Strategy Inventory--Self-Report. Journal of School Psychology, 44(4), 307-322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.05.002
Cleary, T. J., Platten, P., & Nelson, A. (2008). Effectiveness of Self-Regulation Empowerment Program with urban high school students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 20(1), 70-107. https://doi.org/10.4219/jaa-2008-866.
Elliot, A.J. & Dweck, C.S. (2005). Competence and motivation. In A. Elliot and C. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 3-12). New York: Guilford Press.
Everson, H. T., & Tobias, S. (1998). The ability to estimate knowledge and performance in college: A metacognitive analysis. Instructional Science, 26(1), 65-79.
Hacker, D. J., Bol, L., & Bahbahani, K. (2008). Explaining calibration accuracy in classroom contexts: The effects of incentives, reflection, and explanatory style. Metacognition and Learning, 3(2), 101-121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-008-9021-5
Hacker, D. J., Bol, L., Horgan, D. D., & Rakow, E. A. (2000). Test prediction and performance in a classroom context. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(1), 160-170. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.1.160
Hughes, L. (2012). Self-Assessment Questionnaire (SAQ). [Unpublished Instructional Material].
Keleman, W. L., Winningham, R. G., & Weaver, C. A. III. (2007). Repeated testing sessions and scholastic aptitude in college students’ metacognitive accuracy. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19(4-5), 689-717. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440701326170
Kember, D., Jamieson, Q. W., Pomfret, M., & Wong, E. (1995). Learning approaches, study time and performance. Higher Education, 29, 329-343.
Kirschner, P.A., Sweller, J. & Clark, R.E. 2006. Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86.
Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. & Fredricks, J.A. (2008). Developmental perspectives on achievement motivation: Personal and contextual influences. In J. Y. Shah & W. L. Gardner (Eds.), Handbook of motivation science: The social psychological perspective (pp 448 – 464). Guilford Press.
Miller, T. M., & Geraci, L. (2011). Training metacognition in the classroom: The influence of incentives and feedback on exam predictions. Metacognition and Learning, 6(3), 303-314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-011-9083-7
Moos, D. C. & Ringdal, A. (2012). Self-Regulated Learning in the Classroom: A Literature Review on the Teacher’s Role. Education Research International, Volume 2012, Article ID 423284, 15 pages
Nietfeld, J. L., Cao, L., & Osborne, J. W. (2005), Metacognitive monitoring accuracy and student performance in the postsecondary classroom. The Journal of Experimental Education, 74(1), 7-28. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20157410
Nietfeld, J. L., Cao, L., & Osborne, J. W. (2006). The effect of distributed monitoring exercises and feedback on performance, monitoring accuracy, and self-efficacy. Metacognition and Learning, 1, 159-179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10409-006-9595-6
OECD (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do (Summary), OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/a9b5930a-en
Ontario Ministry of Education (2010). Growing success: Assessment, evaluation, and reporting in Ontario schools. First edition, covering Grades 1 to 12. Queen’s Printer for Ontario.
Paris, S. G., & Paris, A. H. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 36(2), 89-101. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3602_4
Perry, N., Phillips, L., & Dowler, J. (2004). Examining features of tasks and their potential to promote self-regulated learning. Teachers College Record, 106(9), 1854–1878. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2004.004
Perry, N. E., & Vandekamp, K. J. O. (2000). Creating classroom contexts that support young children's development of self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 33, 821-843.
Pintrich, P. R., Wolters, C. A., & Baxter, G. P. (2000). Assessing metacognition and self-regulated learning. In G. Schraw & J. C. Impara (Eds.), Issues in the measurement of metacognition (pp. 43-97). Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.
Plant, E. A., Ericsson, K. A., Hill, L., & Asberg, K. (2005). Why study time does not predict grade point average across college students: Implications of deliberate practice for academic performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30(1), 96-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.06.001
Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., Curby, T. W., Grimm, K. J., Nathanson, L., & Brock, L. L. (2009). The contributions of children’s self-regulation and classroom quality to children’s adaptive behaviours in the kindergarten classroom. Developmental Psychology, 45(4), 958-972. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015861
Schmitter-Edgecombe, M., & Anderson, J. W. (2007). Feeling-of-knowing in episodic memory following moderate-to-severe closed-head injury. Neuropsychology, 21(2), 224-234. https://doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.21.2.224
Schraw, G. (1995). Measures of feeling-of-knowing accuracy: A new look at an old problem. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9(4), 321-332. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350090405Schunk, D. H. & Pajares, F. (2005). In A. Elliot and C. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 3-12). New York: Guilford Press.
Shanker, S. G. (2012). Calm, Alert and Learning: Classroom Strategies for Self-Regulation. Pearson.
Thiede, K. W., Anderson, M. C., & Therriault, D. (2003). Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of texts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 66-73.
Tobias, S., & Everson, H. T. (2009). The importance of knowing what you know: A knowledge monitoring framework for studying metacognition in education. In D.L. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 107-127). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
Tobias, S., Everson, H. T., and Laitusis, V. (1999). Towards a performance based measure of metacognitive knowledge monitoring: Relationships with self-reports and behavior ratings. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of American Educational Research Association, Montreal, QC, Canada. https://files.eric.edu.gove/fulltext/ED432590.pdf
Urdan, T., & Midgley, C. (2003). Changes in the perceived classroom goal structure and pattern of adaptive learning during early adolescence. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28(4), 524-551. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00060-7
Veenman, M. V. J., & Spaans, M. A. (2005). Relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills: Age and task differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 15(2), 159-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2004.12.001
Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Schiefele, U., Roeser, R. W., & Davis-Kean, P. (2006). Development of achievement motivation. In N. Eisenberg, W. Damon, & R. M. Lernern (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and personality development (pp. 933–1002). John Wiley & Sons, Inc..
Winne, P. H. (2011). A cognitive and metacognitive analysis of self-regulated learning. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 15-32). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
Winne, P.H. & Hadwin, A.F. (2012). The weave of motivation and self-regulated learning. In D.H. Schunk & B.J. Zimmerman, Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 297-314).
Winne, P. H., & Perry, N. E. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In P. Pintrich, M. Boekaerts & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 531-566). Academic Press.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American educational research journal, 45(1), 166-183.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2011). Motivational sources of and outcomes of self-regulated learning and performance. In Zimmerman, B. J. & Schunk, D.H., Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 49-64). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2012). Goal setting: A key proactive source of academic self-regulation. In D.H. Schunk & B.J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 267-295). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group .
Zimmerman, B. J., Moylan, A., Hudesman, J., White, N., & Flugman, B. (2011). Enhancing self-reflection and mathematics achievement in at-risk urban technical college students. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 53(1), 108-127.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 McGill Journal of Education / Revue des sciences de l'éducation de McGill
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Those wishing to reproduce all or part of any material published on this website are asked to email mje.education@mcgill.ca for permission and to acknowledge the McGill Journal of Education as the original source.
Authors must transfer copyright of their article to MJE. Authors may use all or parts of their work in any future publication with the article's origin in MJE acknowledged in the customary manner.
A copy of our standard form may be requested from mje.education@mcgill.ca
