Enacted agency in a cross-border, online biliteracy curriculum making: Creativity and bilingual digital storytelling
Keywords:New Materialism, curriculum, multiliteracies, biliteracy, bilingual education
This research investigated potentials of bilingual digital story making to engage the creativity of 13 Canadian and Chinese biliteracy learners aged 11–15. Findings in this paper draw on six focal participants and their digital story creation. Informed by asset-oriented multiliteracies, new media literacies, and new materialism, this research adopted a netnography methodology to explore the communal and sociomaterial practices embedded in the intra-actions of human, matter, and virtual spaces of Seesaw and Skype. Drawing on data from six focal students, findings relate how intra-actions among researchers, teachers, students, matters, and spaces shaped participants’ creative acts. This research adds to the knowledge of developing and applying material-informed pedagogies which attend to the enacted agency among teachers, students, materials, and spaces.
Barnett, V., & Halls, D. (2008). Wire bicycles: A journey with Galimoto. In C. A. Wien (Ed.), Emergent curriculum in the primary classroom: Interpreting the Reggio Emilia approach in school (pp. 52-63). Teachers College Press.
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press. http://doi.org/10.1215/9780822388128
Boyd, D., & Bath, C. (2017). Capturing student perspectives through a “Reggio” lens. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 29(2), 192-200.
Carter, M., Belliveau, G., Irwin, R. L., & Beare, D. (2011). A/r/tography as pedagogy: A promise without guarantee. Canadian Review of Art Education, 38(1), 17-32.
Cloonan, A. (2010). Multiliteracies, multimodality and teacher professional learning. Common Ground. http://doi.org/10.18848/978-1-86335-713-5/CGP
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2000). Introduction: Multiliteracies: The beginnings of an idea. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 3-8). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203979402-5
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2009). Multiliteracies: New literacies, new learning. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 4(3), 164195. http://doi.org/10.1080/15544800903076044
Cummins, J., Hu, S., Markus, P., & Montero, M. K. (2015). Identity texts and academic achievement: Connecting the dots in multilingual school contexts. TESOL Quarterly, 49(3), 555-581. http://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.241
Fantozzi, V. B., Cottino, E., & Gennarelli, C. (2013). Mapping their place: Preschoolers explore space, place, and literacy. Social Studies and the Young Learner, 26(1), 5-10.
Garcia, A., Luke, A., & Seglem, R. (2018). Looking at the next 20 years of multiliteracies: A discussion with Allan Luke. Theory into Practice, 57(1), 72-78. http://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2017.1390330
González, N., Moll, L., & Amanti, C. (2005). Introduction: Theorizing practices. In C. González, L. Moll, & C. Amanti (Eds.), Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms (pp. 1-28). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410613462
Hackett, A., & Somerville, M. (2017). Posthuman literacies: Young children moving in time, place and more-than-human worlds. Journal of Early Literacy Research, 17(3), 374-391. http://doi.org/10.1177/1468798417704031
Hesterman, S. (2011). Extending Reggio Emilia principles in the middle school context: A western Australian case study. Educational Practice and Theory, 33(1), 73-91. http://doi.org/10.7459/ept/33.1.05
Heydon, R. M., & Wang, P. (2006). Curricular ethics in early childhood education programming: A challenge to the Ontario kindergarten program. McGill Journal of Education, 41(3), 29-46.
Howard, P., Becker, C., Wiebe, S., Carter, M., Gouzouasis, P., McLarnon, M., Richardson, P., Ricketts, K., & Shuman, L. (2018). Creativity and pedagogical innovation: Exploring teachers' experiences of risk-taking. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 50(6), 850-864. http://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2018.1479451
Jacobs, G. E. (2014). Reimagining multiliteracies: A response to Leander and Boldt. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 57(4), 270-273. http://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.249
Jenkins, H. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. MIT Press. http://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/8435.001.0001
Justice, S. (2016). Learning to teach in the digital age: New materialities and maker paradigms in schools. Peter Lang Publishing, Inc. https://doi.org/10.3726/978-1-4539-1887-6
Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2008). Language education and multiliteracies. In T. May & N. H. Hornberger (Vol. Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and education: Vol. 1. Language policy and political issues in education (pp. 195-212). Springer. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30424-3_15
Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2010). The teacher as designer: Pedagogy in the new media age. E-Learning and Digital Media, 7(3), 200-222. doi:10.2304/elea.2010.7.3.200. http://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2010.7.3.200
Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. (2012). Literacies. Cambridge University Press. http://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139196581
Kress, G. R. (1997). Before writing: Rethinking the paths to literacy. Routledge. http://doi.org/10.4324/9780203992692
Kozinets, R. V. (2010a). Netnography: Doing ethnographic research online. Sage Publications. http://doi.org/10.22230/cjc.2013v38n1a2631
Kozinets, R. (2010b, March). Netnography, the marketer’s secret weapon: How social media understanding drives innovation. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/57c5f156ff7c504bc28f9f66/t/57c900a5c534a5c7c8982a93/1472790696417/NetBase+Netnography+Paper_March+2010+%281%29.pdf
Kuby, C. R., & Rowsell, J. (2017). Early literacy and the posthuman: Pedagogies and methodologies. Journal of Early Literacy Research, 17(3), 285-296. http://doi.org/10.1177/1468798417715720
Kuby, C.R., Rucker, T.G., & Darolia, L.H. (2017). Persistence(ing): Posthuman agency in a writers’ studio. Journal of Early Literacy Research, 17(3), 353-373. http://doi.org/10.1177/1468798417712067
Kuby, C.R., Spector, K., & Thiel, J.J. (2019). Cuts too small: An introduction. In C.R. Kuby, K. Spector, & J.J. Thiel (Eds.), Posthumanism and literacy education: Knowing/Becoming/Doing literacies (pp. 1-17). Routledge.
Lather, P., & St. Pierre, E. A. (2013). Post-qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 629-633. http://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2013.788752
Leander, K., & Boldt, G. (2012). Rereading “a pedagogy of multiliteracies”: Bodies, texts, and emergence. Journal of Literacy Research, 45(1), 22-46. http://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X12468587
Mills, D. N. (2013). A qualitative study: Integrating art and science in the environment (Publication No. ED552989) [Doctoral dissertation, Wayne State University]. ERIC.
Mirra, N., Morrell, E., & Filipiak, D. (2018). From digital consumption to digital invention: Toward a new critical theory and practice of multiliteracies. Theory Into Practice, 57(1), 12-19. http://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2017.1390336
Moje, E. B., & Luke, A. (2009). Literacy and identity: Examining the metaphors in history and contemporary research. Reading Research Quarterly, 44(4), 415-437. http://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.44.4.7
Murris, K. (2016). The posthuman child: Educational transformation through philosophy with picturebooks. Routledge. http://doi.org/10.4324/9781315718002
Newfield, D., & Bozalek, V. (2019). A /thebuwa hauntology, from silence to speech: Reconfiguring literacy practices. In C.R. Kuby, K. Spector, & J.J. Thiel (Eds.), Posthumanism and literacy education: Knowing / Becoming / Doing literacies (pp. 37-54). Routledge.
Rowsell, J., & Burgess, J. (2017). Around and around we go: Layering turns into the multiliteracies framework. In F. Serafini and E. Gee (Eds.), Remixing multiliteracies: Theory and practice from New London to new times (pp. 74-90). Teachers College Press.
Smythe, S., Hill, C., MacDonald, M., Dagenais, D., Sinclair, N., & Toohey, K. (2017). Disrupting boundaries in education research and practice. Cambridge University Press. http://doi.org/10.1017/9781108234931
Srivastava, P., & Hopwood, N. (2009). A practical iterative framework for qualitative data analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(1), 76-84. http://doi.org/10.1177/160940690900800107
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council. (2018). The next generation of emerging global challenges. Policy Horizons Canada. https://horizons.gc.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/SSHRC-Emerging-Global-Challenges-ENG-Web-New-1.pdf
Stegelin, D. A. (2003). Application of the Reggio Emilia approach to early childhood science curriculum. Early Childhood Education Journal, 30(3), 163-169. http://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022013905793
Tal, C. (2014). Introduction of an emergent curriculum and an inclusive pedagogy in a traditional setting in Israel: A case study. International Journal of Early Years Education, 22(2), 141-155. http://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2014.898578
The New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–92. http://doi.org/10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u
Thomas, N. (2008). Small boxes, big sounds: Spontaneous music in kindergarten. In C. A. Wien (Ed.), Emergent curriculum in the primary classroom: Interpreting the Reggio Emilia approach in school (pp. 19-25). Teachers College Press. http://doi.org/10.1109/BigDataService.2017.18
Toohey, K., Dagenais, D., Fodor, A., Hof, L., Nuñez, O., Singh, A., & Schulze, L. (2015). “That sounds so cool”: Entanglements of children, digital tools, and literacy practices. TESOL, 49(3), 461-485. http://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.236
UNESCO (2017, January 31). E2030: Education and skills for the 21st century. http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/FIELD/Santiago/pdf/Habilidades-SXXI-Buenos-Aires-Eng.pdf
Verwys, S. K. (2007). “Teacher, teacher, tell us about the brain!” Sharing decision making about curriculum in preschool. YC Young Children, 62(4), 97-100.
Wiebe, S., & Caseley Smith, C. (2016). A/r/tography and teacher education in the 21st century. McGill Journal of Education, 51(3), 1163-1178. http://doi.org/10.7202/1039633ar
Zhang, Z., & Heydon, R. (2014). Lived literacy curriculum in a globalized schooling context: A case study of a Sino-Canadian transnational programme. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 46(3), 389418. http://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2013.878395
Zhang, Z. (2015). Chinese and Canadian teachers implement a hybrid Sino-Canadian curriculum: A multiliteracies perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 48(2015), 106-116. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.02.006
Zhang, Z., Heydon, R., Li, W., & Malins, P. (2020). Literacies and identities in transnational education: A case study of literacy curricula in a Canadian transnational education program in China. Curriculum Journal, 31(1). http://doi.org/10.1002/curj.5
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2021 McGill Journal of Education / Revue des sciences de l'éducation de McGill
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Those wishing to reproduce all or part of any material published on this website are asked to email firstname.lastname@example.org for permission and to acknowledge the McGill Journal of Education as the original source.
Authors must transfer copyright of their article to MJE. Authors may use all or parts of their work in any future publication with the article's origin in MJE acknowledged in the customary manner.
A copy of our standard form may be requested from email@example.com