The agency of pedagogical consultants in a networked community of practice
Keywords:
agency, community of practice, pedagogical consultant, multiple case study, cross-order collaborationAbstract
Pedagogical consultants (PCs) act as agents of change within their professional environments, actively pursuing their own development through engagement in communities of practice, particularly within inter-institutional networks. This article examines the exercise of agency among members of such a community, composed of PCs from various educational institutions. A qualitative analysis of interviews and community-related documents—both used and produced—reveals several commonalities across the cases. These include a collaborative dynamic grounded in both members’ professional culture and their institutional contexts, as well as a form of symmetrical proxy agency, whereby each member’s agency is supported and reinforced by the others. Instances of resistance were marginal, as the community was primarily oriented toward collaborative problem-solving and the pursuit of constructive solutions.
References
Adebayo, S. B. (2019). Emerging perspectives of teacher agency in a post-conflict setting: The case of Liberia. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102928
Alavi, S. B. et McCormick, J. (2016). Implications of proxy efficacy for studies of team leadership in organizational settings. European Psychologist, 21(3), 218-228. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000270
Balgopal, M. M. (2020). STEM teacher agency: A case study of initiating and implementing curricular reform. Science Education, 104(4), 762-785. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21578
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. Freeman.
Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of personality. Dans L. Pervin et O. John (dir.), Handbook of Personality (3e éd., p. 154-196). Guilford.
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
Bandura, A. (2006). Toward a psychology of human agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(2), 164-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00011.x
Biesta, G. et Tedder, M. (2006, février). How is agency possible? Towards an ecological understanding of agency-as-achievement. Learning Lives: Learning, Identity, and Agency in the Life Course. Working Paper Five, Exeter: Teaching and Learning Research Programme.
Brennan, K. (2012). Best of both worlds: Issues of structure and agency in computational creation, in and out of school [thèse de doctorat, MIT]. Dspace@MIT. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
Burns, T. R. et Dietz, T. (2000). Human agency and evolutionary processes: Institutional dynamics and social revolution. Dans B. Whittrock. (dir.), Agency in Social Theory. Sage.
Butler, D. L., Schnellert, L. et MacNeil, K. (2015). Collaborative inquiry and distributed agency in educational change: A case study of a multi-level community of inquiry. Journal of Educational Change, 16(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-014-9227-z
Carré, P. (2004). Bandura : une psychologie pour le XXIe siècle ? Savoirs, Hors-série, 9-50. http://doi.org/10.3917/savo.hs01.0009
Communagir. (s. d.). Les outils d’animation. Communagir pour emporter. https://communagir.org/contenus-et-outils/communagir-pour-emporter/les-outils-d-animation/
Datnow, A., Hubbard, L. et Mehan, H. (2002). Extending Educational Reform: From One School to Many. RoutledgeFalmer.
Day, C. (1999). Developing Teachers: The Challenges of Lifelong Learning. Falmer Press.
Deschênes, M. et Parent, S. (2022a). Methodology to Study Teacher Agency: A Systematic Review of the Literature. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(4), 2459-2476
Deschênes, M. et Parent, S. (2022b). Vers une définition de l’agentivité du personnel enseignant : une revue systématique de la littérature. Revue des sciences de l’éducation, 48(3). https://doi.org/10.7202/1103273ar
Draelants, H. (2007). Entre le pair et l’expert, trouver la distance qui convient. Une question de légitimation pour le conseiller pédagogique? Recherches sociologiques et anthropologiques, 38(1), 163-182. https://doi.org/10.4000/rsa.525
Duchesne, C. (2016). Complexité et défis associés aux rôles de conseiller pédagogique. McGill Journal of Education/Revue des sciences de l’éducation de McGill, 51(1), 635-656. https://doi.org/10.7202/1037363ar
Emirbayer, M. et Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? The American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962-1023. https://doi.org/10.1086/231294
Engeström, Y. et Sannino, A. (2010). Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future challenges. Educational Research Review, 5(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2009.12.002
Engeström, Y. et Sannino, A. (2013). La volition et l’agentivité transformatrice : perspective théorique de l’activité. Revue internationale du CRIRES : innover dans la tradition de Vygotsky, 1(1), 4-19. https://doi.org/10.51657/ric.v1i1.41017
Gagnon, B. (2009). Recherche-action visant le développement de compétences professionnelles de nouveaux conseillers pédagogiques engagés dans une commission scolaire québécoise [mémoire de maîtrise, Université de Sherbrooke]. Savoirs. https://savoirs.usherbrooke.ca/handle/11143/9842
Gagnon, Y. (2012). L’étude de cas comme méthode de recherche (2e éd.). Presses de l’Université du Québec.
Guillemette, S., Vachon, I. et Guertin, D. (2019). Référentiel de l’agir compétent en conseillance pédagogique en soutien à la réussite des élèves. À l’intention des conseillères et conseillers pédagogiques des commissions scolaires du Québec. JFD Éditions.
Houle, H. et Pratte, M. (2007). La fonction de conseiller pédagogique au collégial. Cégep Sainte-Foy. http://eduq.info/xmlui/handle/11515/29672
Impedovo, M. A. (2020). L’agentivité des enseignants après un master de formation internationale : les implications sur le développement professionnel. McGill Journal of Education/Revue des sciences de l’éducation de McGill, 55(1), 199-218. https://doi.org/10.7202/1075726ar
Jenkins, G. (2020). Teacher agency: The effects of active and passive responses to curriculum change. The Australian Educational Researcher, 47(1), 167-181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-019-00334-2
Jézégou, A. (2014). L’agentivité humaine : un moteur essentiel pour l’élaboration d’un environnement personnel d’apprentissage. Sticef, 21, 239-286. https://doi.org/10.3406/stice.2014.1099
Lachaîne, C. et Duchesne, C. (2019). Le conseiller pédagogique en tant qu’agent de changement : compétences et leadership transformationnel. McGill Journal of Education/Revue des sciences de l’éducation de McGill, 54(3), 625-645. https://doi.org/10.7202/1069773ar
Lapassade, G. (2002). Observation participante. Dans J. Barus-Michel (dir.), Vocabulaire de psychosociologie (p. 375-390). Érès. https://doi.org/10.3917/eres.barus.2002.01.0375
Martin, J. (2004). Self-regulated learning, social cognitive theory, and agency. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 135-145. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3902_4
Payette, A. et Champagne, C. (1997). Le groupe de codéveloppement professionnel. Presses de l’Université du Québec.
Philpott, C. et Oates, C. (2017). Teacher agency and professional learning communities; what can Learning Rounds in Scotland teach us? Professional Development in Education, 43(3), 318-333. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2016.1180316
Pietarinen, J., Pyhältö, K. et Soini, T. (2016). Teacher’s professional agency–a relational approach to teacher learning. Learning: Research and Practice, 2(2), 112-129. https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2016.1181196
Priestley, M., Biesta, G. et Robinson, S. (2013). Teachers as agents of change: teacher agency and emerging models of curriculum. Dans M. Priestley et G. Biesta (dir.), Reinventing the Curriculum: New Trends in Curriculum Policy and Practice (p. 187-206). Bloomsbury Academic.
Priestley, M., Biesta, G. et Robinson, S. (2015). Teacher Agency: An Ecological Approach. Bloomsbury.
Priestley, M., Edwards, R., Priestley, A. et Miller, K. (2012). Teacher agency in curriculum making: Agents of change and spaces for maneuver. Curriculum Inquiry, 42(2), 191-214. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-873X.2012.00588.x
Savoie-Zajc, L. (2009). L’entrevue semi-dirigée. Dans B. Gauthier (dir.), Recherche sociale : de la problématique à la collecte des données (p. 337-360). Presses de l’Université du Québec.
Shields, C. (2005). The dilemma of proxy-agency in exercise: A social-cognitive examination of the balance between reliance and self-regulatory ability [thèse de doctorat, Université de Waterloo, Canada].
Tardif, M. et Lessard, C. (2004). Le travail enseignant au quotidien (2e éd.). Presses de l’Université Laval.
Wenger, E. (2005). La théorie des communautés de pratique (traduit et adapté par F. Gervais). Presses de l’Université du Québec.
Wenger, E., McDermott, R. et Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating Communities of Practice. Harvard Business School Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 McGill Journal of Education / Revue des sciences de l'éducation de McGill

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
License
Copyright (c) 202X McGill Journal of Education / Revue des sciences de l'éducation de McGill
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.