The development of phonological awareness. Comparison of teaching practices in and out of priority education

Authors

  • Laurent Hen Université de Strasbourg
  • Maria Popa-Roch Université de Strasbourg
  • Odile Rohmer Université de Strasbourg
  • Nadege Doignon-Camus Université de Strasbourg

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26443/mje/rsem.v58i1.10171

Keywords:

Phonological awareness, priority education, diversity of teaching practices

Abstract

The first aim of this study was to observe, based on established research, the teaching practices for developing the phonological awareness of pre-reading students. The second aim was to determine whether these vary according to the students’ socio-economic background. These practices were observed in real class situations with kindergarten students in priority education areas (i.e., least advantaged areas) or in standard areas. An observation grid was used to record the activity, the phonological unit, and the support modalities. The results indicate that teachers favour simple tasks, accessible units, and less effective modalities. The use ineffective modalities appears to be more pronounced in priority education areas than in standard areas.

Author Biographies

Laurent Hen, Université de Strasbourg

is an inspector of national education. His research focuses on the development of phonological awareness. laurent.hen@ac-reunion.fr

Maria Popa-Roch , Université de Strasbourg

is a lecturer at the Institut national supérieur du professorat et de l’éducation at the University of Strasbourg. Her research focuses on the social perceptions of individuals due to their group affiliations. She is particularly interested in stereotypes and prejudices against children living with disabilities at school. poparoch@unistra.fr

Odile Rohmer, Université de Strasbourg

is professor of Social Psychology at the University of Strasbourg. Her research focuses mainly on social cognition in the field of intergroup relations. She participates in several programmes aimed at understanding the mechanisms that facilitate or inhibit the social participation of persons living with disabilities, and more specifically, inclusive education. odile.rohmer@unistra.fr

Nadege Doignon-Camus , Université de Strasbourg

is professor of Cognitive Psychology at the Institut national supérieur du professorat et de l’éducation at the University of Strasbourg. Her main research focuses on learning the very first relationships between writing and speaking. She is also interested in the learning of children living with disabilities. doignon@unistra.fr

References

Anthony, J. L., et Lonigan, C. J. (2004). The nature of phonological awareness: Converging evidence from four studies of preschool and early grade school children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 43‑55. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.43

Anthony, J. L., Lonigan, C., Driscoll, K., Phillips, B., et Burgess, S. (2003). Phonological sensitivity: A quasi-parallel progression of word structure units and cognitive operations. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(4), 470-487. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.38.4.3

Autin, F., et Butera, F. (2016). Editorial: Institutional determinants of social inequalities. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.02027

Batruch, A., Autin, F., Bataillard, F., et Butera, F. (2019). School selection and the social class divide: How tracking contributes to the reproduction of inequalities. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(3), 477‑490. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218791804

Bosse, M. L., et Zagar, D. (2016). La conscience phonémique en maternelle : Etat des connaissances et proposition d’évolution des pratiques pédagogiques actuelles. ANAE - Approche Neuropsychologique des Apprentissages Chez l’Enfant, 139(27), 573-582. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01623137

Bradley, L., et Bryant, P. E. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read: A causal connection. Nature, 301(5899), 419‑421. https://doi.org/10.1038/301419a0

Bressoux, P. (2003). Jugements scolaires et prophéties autoréalisatrices : anciennes questions et nouvelles réponses. Les Dossiers des Sciences de l’Education, 10, 45‑58. https://doi.org/10.3406/dsedu.2003.1028

Bryant, P. E., MacLean, M., Bradley, L. L., et Crossland, J. (1990). Rhyme and alliteration, phoneme detection, and learning to read. Developmental Psychology, 26(3), 429‑438. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.26.3.429

Castles, A., et Coltheart, M. (2004). Is there a causal link from phonological awareness to success in learning to read? Cognition, 91(1), 77‑111. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00164-1

Castles, A., Rastle, K., et Nation, K. (2018). Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest: A Journal of the American Psychological Society, 19(1), 5‑51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100618772271

CNESCO - Conseil National d'Evaluation du Système Scolaire (2016). Comment l’école amplifie-t-elle les inégalités sociales et migratoires ? http://www.cnesco.fr/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/160927Dossier_ synthese_inegalites.pdf

Coltheart, M. (1983). Child development: Phonological awareness: A preschool precursor of success in reading. Nature, 301, 370. https://doi.org/10.1038/301370a0

Crahay, M., Wanlin, P., Issaieva, E., et Laduron, I. (2010). Fonctions, structuration et évolution des croyances (et connaissances) des enseignants. Revue Française de Pédagogie, 172, 85-129. https://doi.org/10.4000/rfp.2296

Croizet, J. C., et Claire, T. (1998). Extending the concept of stereotype and threat to social class: The intellectual underperformance of students from low socioeconomic backgrounds. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(6), 588–594. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167298246003

Croizet, J. C., Goudeau, S., Marot, M., et Millet, M. (2017). How do educational contexts contribute to the social class achievement gap: Documenting symbolic violence from a social psychological point of view. Current Opinion in Psychology, 18, 105‑110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.08.025

Croizet, JC., Autin, F., Goudeau, S., Marot, M., Millet, M. (2019). Education and social class: Highlighting how the educational system perpetuates social inequality. Dans J. Jetten et K. Peters (dir.) The social psychology of inequality. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_9

Dehaene, S., Pegado, F., Braga, L. W., Ventura, P., Filho, G. N., Jobert, A., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Kolinsky, R., Morais, J., et Cohen, L. (2011). L’impact de l’apprentissage de la lecture sur le cerveau. Médecine Sciences, 27(3), 236‑238. https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/2011273236

Demont, E., et Gombert, J. E. (2004). L'apprentissage de la lecture : évolution des procédures et apprentissage implicite. Enfance : Approche Neuropsychologique de la Dyslexie Développementale, 3, 245-257.

DEPP – Direction de l’Évaluation de la Prospective et de la Performance (2016). L'éducation prioritaire : etat des lieux. https://archives-statistiques-depp.education.gouv.fr/Default/doc/ SYRACUSE/43875/l-education-prioritaire-etat-des-lieux-alexia-stefanou?_lg=fr-FR

Desombre, C., Delaval, M., et Jury, M. (2021). Influence of social support on teachers’ attitudes toward inclusive education. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.736535

Duncan, L., et Seymour, P. (2000). A small-to-large unit progression in metaphonological awareness and reading? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A Human Experimental Psychology, 53, 1081‑1104. https://doi.org/10.1080/713755936

Dubet, F. (2019). Inégalités scolaires : structures, processus et modèles de justice - le débat en France au cours des cinquante dernières années. Revue Européenne des Sciences Sociales, 57(2), 111‑136.

Ecalle, J., et Magnan, A. (2002). The development of epiphonological and metaphonological processing at the start of learning to read: A longitudinal study. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 17(1), 47‑62. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173204

Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., Willows, D. M., Schuster, B. V., Yaghoub-Zadeh, Z., et Shanahan, T. (2001). Phonemic awareness instruction helps children learn to read: Evidence from the national reading panel’s meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 36(3), 250‑287. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.36.3.2

Felouzis, G., Fouquet-Chauprade, B., Charmillot, S., et Impérial-Arefaïne, L. (2016). Inégalités scolaires et politiques d’éducation. Contribution préparatoire au rapport Inégalités sociales et migratoires. Comment l’école amplifie- t-elle les inégalités? Conseil National d’Evaluation du Système Scolaire.

Glock, S., Krolak-Schwerdt, S., et Hörstermann, T. (2016). The higher the SES the better? Implicit and explicit attitudes influence preservice teachers’ judgments of students. Dans C. Fields (dir.), Stereotypes and stereotyping: Misperceptions, perspectives and role of social media (p. 1-20). Nova Science Publishers, Inc.

Goudeau, S., et Croizet, J. C. (2017). Hidden advantages and disadvantages of social class: How classroom settings reproduce social inequality by staging unfair comparison. Psychological Science, 28(2), 162‑170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616676600

Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers. Maximizing impact on learning. Routledge.

Hulme, C., Snowling, M., Caravolas, M., et Carroll, C. (2005). Phonological skills are (probably) one cause of success in learning to read: A comment on Castles and Coltheart. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9(4), 351-365. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0904_2

Kherroubi, M., et Rochex, J. Y. (2004). La recherche en éducation et les ZEP en France. Apprentissages et exercice professionnel en ZEP : Résultats, analyses, interprétations. Revue Française de Pédagogie, 146(1), 115‑190. https://www.persee.fr/doc/rfp_0556-7807_2004_num_146_1_3101

Millet, M., et Croizet, J. C. (2016). L’école des incapables ? La maternelle, un apprentissage de la domination. La Dispute. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01378155

Ministère de l'Education Nationale de l'Enseignement et de la Recherche (2015). Programme d'enseignement de l'école maternelle. https://www.education.gouv.fr/bo/15/Special2/ MENE1504759A.htm

Ministère de l'Education Nationale de l'Enseignement et de la Recherche (2018). Le guide pour enseigner la lecture et l'écriture au CP. https://eduscol.education.fr/document/1508/ download?attachment

Ministère de l'Education Nationale de l'Enseignement et de la Recherche (2019a). Programme d'enseignement de l'école maternelle. https://www.education.gouv.fr/bo/19/Hebdo22/ MENE1915456N.htm?cid_bo=142293

Ministère de l'Education Nationale de l'Enseignement et de la Recherche (2019b). Les résultats des évaluations repères de CP et CE1 2019. https://www.education.gouv.fr/resultats-des-evaluations-reperes-cp-et-ce1-2019-1025

Ministère de l'Education Nationale de l'Enseignement et de la Recherche (2021). L'état de l'école. https://www.education.gouv.fr/l-etat-de-l-ecole-2020-307185

Peltier-Barbier, M. L., Ngono, B., Amigues, R., Kherroubi, M., (2003). Modifier ses pratiques c'est difficile. https://www.persee.fr/doc/refor_0988-1824_2003_num_44_1_1869

PISA (2018). Program for International Student Assessment. OECD.

Pit-Ten Cate, I. M., et Glock, S. (2018). Teachers' attitudes towards students with high- and low-educated parents. Social Psychology of Education, 21, 725-742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-018-9436-z

Stanovich, K. E. (1993). Does reading make you smarter? Literacy and the development of verbal intelligence. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 24, 133‑180. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2407(08)60302-X

Treiman, R., et Zukowski, A. (1996). Children's sensitivity to syllables, onsets, rimes, and phonemes. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 62(3), 193–215.

UNESCO - United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (2017). Global education monitoring report : Rendre des comptes en matière d’éducation. https://fr.unesco.org/gem-report/node/1464

Ukrainetz, T., Nuspl, J., Wilkerson, K., et Beddes, S. (2011). The effects of syllable instruction on phonemic awareness in preschoolers. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 26, 50‑60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2010.04.006

Vazeux, M., Doignon-Camus, N., Bosse, M. L., Mahé, G., Guo, T., et Zagar D. (2020) Syllable-first rather than letter-first to improve phonemic awareness. Scientific Reports, 10 (22130). https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-79240-y

Wagner, R. K., et Torgesen, J. K. (1987). La nature du traitement phonologique et son rôle causal dans l'acquisition des compétences en lecture. Bulletin Psychologique, 101 (2), 192–212. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.101.2.192

Ziegler, J. C., et Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.3

Published

2024-06-20

How to Cite

Hen, L., Popa-Roch , M., Rohmer, O., & Doignon-Camus , N. (2024). The development of phonological awareness. Comparison of teaching practices in and out of priority education . McGill Journal of Education / Revue Des Sciences De l’éducation De McGill, 58(1), 61–77. https://doi.org/10.26443/mje/rsem.v58i1.10171

Issue

Section

Special Issue - Articles