ON THE IMPLICATIONS OF MAINSTREAMING IN THE USA: INTERPROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION
AbstractWhen the United States takes a step forward, it is a firm step. The word "mainstreaming" owes its prominence in education today to the Public Law requiring it, for it has placed the undertaking to which this term refers so firmly on the map that there can be no evading its many and costly obligations. Reynolds explores the kinds of obligation that are the most difficult to engage and yet the most critical for success - those changes of role (and by implication, of assumptions of status) between the professionals who together must evolve and monitor each child's "individualized education program." There are acute and unfamiliar problems of process here that the several kinds of professional involved must understand and resolve. He offers three "structures" helpful to carrying on complex communications in ways which will serve the educational purposes that the Law has stipulated.
How to Cite
Those wishing to reproduce all or part of any material published on this website are asked to email email@example.com for permission and to acknowledge the McGill Journal of Education as the original source.
Authors must transfer copyright of their article to MJE. Authors may use all or parts of their work in any future publication with the article's origin in MJE acknowledged in the customary manner.
A copy of our standard form may be requested from firstname.lastname@example.org