Generative bullshit and phronesis: A self-inquiry into the use of generative intelligence in Social Sciences and Humanities education
Keywords:
Generative artificial intelligence, critical ethos and phronesis, self-inquiry / auto-inquiry , epistemology of the social sciences and humanities, didactics of the social sciences and humanitiesAbstract
Research and education place high expectations on generative artificial intelligence (GenAI), yet it fosters rapid and often insufficiently controlled user trust. This note from the field presents a self-inquiry based on many exchanges with ChatGPT, supported by logging, macros, and typologies. It introduces the concept of generative bullshit (plausible discourse that simulates authority, and rigor without sufficient evidence, and without intent to deceive). The analysis connects these deviations to scholarly ethos in the social sciences and humanities (SHS) and to phronesis and shows that GenAI is not a partner but an opaque system that must be disciplined. Its limitations become didactic resources for fostering durable critical practices.
References
Aristote. (ca 340/1992). Éthique à Nicomaque. Librairie générale française.
Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A. et Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? In Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT ’21). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922
Bourdieu, P. (1997/2003). Méditations pascaliennes. Seuil.
Dewey, J. (1938/1967). Logique : la théorie de l’enquête. Presses universitaires de France.
Dupuis-Déri, F. et Éthier, M.-A. (dir.). (2016). La guerre culturelle des conservateurs québécois. M Éditeur.
Éthier, M.-A. et Lefrançois, D. (2021). Mondes profanes : enseignement, fiction et histoire (2e éd. rev. et augm.). Presses de l’Université Laval.
Frankfurt, H. G. (1986/2005). On bullshit. Princeton University Press.
Gingras, Y. (2026, 30 mai). L’esprit critique contre la pensée magique. Le Devoir. https://www.ledevoir.com/actualites/le-devoir-de/984008/esprit-critique-contre-pensee-magique
Gomes, L. (2023). Enseignement de l’histoire et fact-checking : L’étude problématisée des documents pour construire des savoirs émancipateurs. Dans J. Buttier et A. Panagiotounakos (dir.), Des savoirs pour agir sur le monde : Quels apprentissages des élèves face aux enjeux contemporains ? (p. 85-97). Presses universitaires de Grenoble.
KPMG LLP. (2025, 9 octobre). La popularité grandissante de l’IA générative auprès des étudiants canadiens crée de nouveaux dilemmes [Communiqué de presse]. Newswire.ca. https://www.newswire.ca/fr/news-releases/la-popularite-grandissante-de-l-ia-generative-aupres-des-etudiants-canadiens-cree-de-nouveaux-dilemmes-815931615.html
Li, Z., Wang, Z., Wang, W., Hung, K., Xie, H. et Wang, F. L. (2025). Retrieval-augmented generation for educational application: A systematic survey. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100417
UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379707
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 McGill Journal of Education / Revue des sciences de l'éducation de McGill

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
