Addressing pre-service teachers’ mathematical reasoning through reverse engineering

Authors

  • Daniel Krause University of Saskatchewan

Keywords:

Mathematical Reasoning, reverse engineering pedagogy, mathematical games, mathematics teacher education, teacher reflection

Abstract

In this Note from the Field, I show how undergraduate pre-service teachers exercised mathematical reasoning when they were required to find the rules determining their score in successive rounds of an iterative game. The rules were hidden from them, and therefore they needed to use mathematical reasoning to reverse engineer the rules based on their scores. The teachers generated similar conjectures as they worked to decipher the rules, even as, with each iteration of the game, pre-service teachers learned the rules to maximize their scores. Reverse engineering, as a pedagogical strategy, would seem to offer a promising avenue for teaching mathematical reasoning in teachers — who can then teach their students.

Author Biography

Daniel Krause, University of Saskatchewan

completed two bachelor’s degrees (B.Sc. in Mathematics, and B.Ed.) and worked as a secondary math and science teacher for nearly a decade. He earned his master’s degree (Educational Technology and Design) before heading to work for Saskatchewan Polytechnic as a curriculum developer for a few years. Currently, he is a full-time faculty Lecturer for and graduate student in the College of Education where he teaches pre-service mathematics and science teachers as he pursues his doctoral degree at the University of Saskatchewan. daniel.krause@usask.ca

References

Barbero, M., Gómez-Chacón, I. M., & Arzarello, F. (2020). Backward reasoning and epistemic actions in discovering processes of strategic games problems. Mathematics (Basel), 8(6), 989. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8060989

Friedman, R. (2021, November 4). You can learn anything through reverse engineering. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2021/11/you-can-learn-anything-through-reverse-engineering

Jeannotte, D., & Kieran, C. (2017). A conceptual model of mathematical reasoning for school mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 96, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9761-8

Karbach, J. (1987). Using Toulmin's model of argumentation. Journal of Teaching Writing, 6(1), 81-92.

Liu, X., Wang, X., Xu, K., & Hu, X. (2023). Effect of reverse engineering pedagogy on primary school students’ computational thinking skills in STEM learning activities. Journal of Intelligence, 11(2), 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11020036

Orlin, B. (2018). Math with bad drawings. Black Dog & Leventhal Publishers.

Orlin, B. (2022). Mathematical games with bad drawings. Black Dog & Leventhal Publishers.

Sprague, L. N. (2022). Defining and measuring mathematical reasoning (Publication No. 29063771). [Master’s thesis, Florida State University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/defining-measuring-mathematical-reasoning/docview/2716571415/se-2

Steen, L. A. (1999). Twenty questions about mathematical reasoning. In L. V. Stiff & F. R. Curcio, (Eds.), Developing mathematical reasoning in grades K – 12 (pp. 270-285). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Yankelewitz, D. (2009). The development of mathematical reasoning in elementary school students' exploration of fraction ideas (Publication No. 3373687). [Doctoral dissertation, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.. https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/development-mathematical-reasoning-elementary/docview/304993588/se-2

Downloads

Published

2025-10-23

How to Cite

Krause, D. (2025). Addressing pre-service teachers’ mathematical reasoning through reverse engineering . McGill Journal of Education / Revue Des Sciences De l’éducation De McGill. Retrieved from https://mje.mcgill.ca/article/view/10484

Issue

Section

Notes from the Field