Qualitative evaluation of a network mobilizing knowledge on equity in education: Possibilities and limitations
Keywords:
Knowledge mobilization network, education, equity, diversity, qualitative evaluation, benefitsAbstract
This article explores the benefits of a knowledge mobilization network (KMN) on equity aimed at countering systemic barriers to learning for Ontario students. The impact of this KMN was initially analyzed quantitatively, leaving less room for the perception of the partners. Aiming for a more comprehensive picture, a qualitative analysis of ten interviews with partners helped to identify new impacts, especially the importance of relationships as a driving force of the network and as a central benefit of knowledge mobilization. This paper highlights the contribution of qualitative evaluation to assess the impact of KMN. Recommendations are made to promote qualitative evaluation and the impact of KMN in a context of diversity.
References
Anderson-Butcher, D., Lachini, A. L., Ball, A., Barke, S. et Martin, L. D. (2016). University–school partnership to examine the adoption and implementation of the Ohio community collaboration model in one urban school district: A mixed-method case study. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 21(3), 190-204. https://doi.org/10.1080/10824669.2016.1183429
Bartholomew, S. S. et Sandholtz, J. H. (2009). Competing views of teaching in a school–university partnership. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(1), 155-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.07.001
Bélanger, N. et Dulude, E. (2021). Investigating the challenges and opportunities of a bilingual equity knowledge brokering network: A critical and reflective perspective from university partners. Policy Futures in Education, 21(1), 58-74. https://doi.org/10.1177/14782103211041484
Best, A. et Holmes, B. (2010). Systems thinking, knowledge and action: Towards better models and methods. The Policy Press, 6(2), 145-159. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426410X502284
Bosma, L. M., Sieving, R. E., Ericson, A., Russ, P., Cavender, L. et Bonine, M. (2010). Elements for successful collaboration between k-8 school, community agency, and university partners: The lead peace partnership. Journal of School Health, 80(10), 501-507. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2010.00534.x
Bowen, S. et Zwi, A. B. (2005). Pathways to “evidence-informed” policy and practice: A framework for action. PLoS Medicine, 2(7), 600–605. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020166
Briggs, G., Briggs, A., Whitmore, E., Maki, A., Ackerley, C., Maisonneuve, A. et Yordy, C. (2015). Questing Your Way to a Knowledge Mobilization Strategy. Community First: Impacts of community engagement. https://carleton.ca/communityfirst/wp-content/uploads/KMB-Questing-Your-Way-to-a-KMb-Strategy-Jun-29-2015.pdf
Briscoe, P., Pollock, K., Campbell, C. et Carr-Harris, S. (2016). Finding the sweet spot: Network structures and processes for increased knowledge mobilization. Brock Journal of Education, 25(1), 19-34. https://doi.org/10.26522/brocked.v25i1.432
Campbell, C., Pollock, K., Briscoe, P., Carr-Harris, S. et Tuters, S. (2017). Developing a knowledge network for applied education research to mobilize evidence in and for educational practice. Educational Research, 59(2), 209-227. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2017.1310364
Coburn, C. E., Penuel, W. R. et Geil, K. E. G. (2013). Research-Practice Partnerships. A Strategy for Leveraging Research for Educational Improvement in School Districts. William T. Grant Foundation. https://wtgrantfoundation.org/library/uploads /2015/10/Research-Practice-Partnerships-at-the-District-Level.pdf
Conseil de recherche en sciences humaines du Canada. (2021). Définitions. https://www.sshrc-crsh.gc.ca/funding-financement/programs-programmes/definitions-fra.aspx#km-mc
Cooper, A. (2014). Knowledge mobilization in education across Canada: A cross-case analysis of 44 research brokering organizations. Evidence et Policy, 10(1), 29-59. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426413X662806
Daly, A. J. et Finnigan, K. S. (2010). A bridge between worlds: Understanding network structure to understand change strategy. Journal of Educational Change, 11(2), 111-138. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-009-9102-5
Davies, H. T. O. et Nutley, S. M. (2008). Learning more about how research-based knowledge gets used: Guidance in the development of new empirical research. William T. Grant Foundation. https://wtgrantfoundation.org/resource/ learning-more- about-how-research-based-knowledge-gets-used-guidance-in-the-development-of-new- empirical-research
Denzin, N. K. et Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (4e ed.). SAGE Publications.
Earl, L. et Hannay, L. (2011). Educators as knowledge leaders. Dans J. Robertson et H. Timperley (dir.), Leadership and Learning (p. 186−201). SAGE Publications.
Groupe de travail. (2021). Rapport sur la pénurie des enseignantes et des enseignants dans le système d’éducation en langue française de l’Ontario. https://files.ontario.ca/edu-report-on-shortage-teachers-french-langauge-education-system-fr-2021-06-17.pdf
Honig, M. I. (2006). Complexity and policy implementation: Challenges and opportunities for the field. Dans M. I. Honig (dir.), New Directions In Education Policy Implementation: Confronting Complexity (p. 1-23). State University of New York Press.
Kramer, D. M. et Wells, R. P. (2005). Achieving buy-in: Building networks to facilitate knowledge transfer. Science Communication, 26(4), 428-444. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547005275427
Leithwood, K. et Louis, K. S. (2012). Linking leadership to student learning. Jossey-Bass.
Malik, S. (2016). Knowledge mobilization in Ontario: A multi-case study of education organizations. University of Toronto.
Malik, S. (2020). Knowledge mobilization for impact: A multi-case study of education organizations. International Journal of Education Policy et Leadership, 16(6). https://doi.org/10.22230/ijepl.2020v16n6a945
Meyer, J. (2000). Using qualitative methods in health related action research. British Medical Journal, 320(178). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7228.178
Miles, M. B., Huberman, M. et Saldana, J. (2019). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (4e ed.). SAGE Publications.
Ministère de l’Éducation de l’Ontario. (2009). Comment tirer parti de la diversité. http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/fre/policyfunding/ equity.pdf
Ng-A-Fook, N., Kane, R. G., Butler, J. K., Glithero, L. et Forte, R. (2015). Brokering Knowledge Mobilization Networks: Policy Reforms, Partnerships, and Teacher Education. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23(122), 1-28. htttp://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v23.2090
Nutley, S., Jung, T. et Walter, I. (2008). The many forms of research-informed practice: A framework for mapping diversity. Cambridge Journal of Education, 38(1), 53-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640801889980
Paillé, P. et Mucchielli, A. (2021). L’analyse qualitative en sciences humaines et sociales (5e éd.). A. Collin.
Pattinson, S., Preese, D. et Dawson, P. (2016). In search of innovative capabilities of communities of practice: A systematic review and typology for future research. Management Learning, 47(5), 506-524. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507616646698
Penuel, W. R. (2017). Research–practice partnerships as a strategy for promoting equitable science teaching and learning through leveraging everyday science. Science Learning In Everyday Life, 101, 520-525. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21285
Phipps, D., Cummings, J., Pepler, D., Craig, W. et Cardinal, S. (2016). The co-produced pathway to impact describes knowledge mobilization processes. Journal of Community Engagement and Scholarship, 9(1), 31-40. https://doi: 10.54656/gokh9495
Réseau de savoir sur l’équité-Equity Knowledge Network (2019). RSEKN Report.
Rodway, J. (2015). Connecting the dots: Understanding the flow of research knowledge within a research brokering network. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.14507/epaa. v23.2180
Savoie-Zajc, L. (2003). L’entrevue semi-dirigée. Dans B. Gauthier (dir.), Recherche en sciences sociales : de la problématique à la collecte des données (4e éd., p. 293-316). Presses de l’Université du Québec.
Shewchuk, S. et Cooper, A. (2018). Exploring equity in Ontario: A provincial scan of equity policies across school boards. Canadian Journal of Education, 41(4), 917-953.
Shore, C. et Wright, S. (2015). Governing by numbers: Audit culture, rankings and the new world order. Social Anthropology, 23(1), 22-28. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.12098
Skipper, Y. et Pepler, D. J. (2021). Knowledge mobilization: Stepping into interdependent and relational space using co-creation. Action Research, 19(3), 588-605. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750320960810
Weiss, C. H. (1979). The many meanings of research utilization. Public Administration Review, 39(5), 426-431. https://doi.org/10.2307/3109916
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 McGill Journal of Education / Revue des sciences de l'éducation de McGill

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Those wishing to reproduce all or part of any material published on this website are asked to email mje.education@mcgill.ca for permission and to acknowledge the McGill Journal of Education as the original source.
Authors must transfer copyright of their article to MJE. Authors may use all or parts of their work in any future publication with the article's origin in MJE acknowledged in the customary manner.
A copy of our standard form may be requested from mje.education@mcgill.ca