CAN ONE TEACH "POLITICAL LITERACY"?

Authors

  • Kenneth Minogue London School of Economics

Abstract

In the burst of conscientious attention to the needs of society that appears to seize academics whenever the supply of students threatens their bread and butter, any discoveries about the usefulness of what they claim to know arouse a special interest. Would it not resolve many of the conflicts of today if the population at large were educated to the point of "political literacy"? A group of people in British public life have thought so and have published a report. Minogue however sets about this report with a profound scepticism and a deft and witty touch; his commentary, in which he predicts that the report will merely make of schools and universities "a breeding ground for quarrelsome bores," is almost unfailingly quotable. He dismantles the doubletalk that endows such terms as 'neutrality,' activity,' and 'deference' with quite arbitrary merits and demerits, and castigates the report for its blindness to what it is feasible to teach and what is not. The context of his remarks is the current political scene in Great Britain; but their applicability to the proper treatment of cant in higher education, like the incidence of that phenomenon itself, is universal.

Author Biography

Kenneth Minogue, London School of Economics

Kenneth Minogue is Reader in Political Science at the London School of Economies, and the author of Nationalism and The Concept of a University. His articles in Encounter include critiques of J. K. Galbraith, Carlos Castaneda, Dr. Spock, and Erich Fromm.

Downloads

Published

1980-01-01

How to Cite

Minogue, K. (1980). CAN ONE TEACH "POLITICAL LITERACY"?. McGill Journal of Education / Revue Des Sciences De l’éducation De McGill, 15(001). Retrieved from https://mje.mcgill.ca/article/view/7311

Issue

Section

Articles