CAN ONE TEACH "POLITICAL LITERACY"?
Abstract
In the burst of conscientious attention to the needs of society that appears to seize academics whenever the supply of students threatens their bread and butter, any discoveries about the usefulness of what they claim to know arouse a special interest. Would it not resolve many of the conflicts of today if the population at large were educated to the point of "political literacy"? A group of people in British public life have thought so and have published a report. Minogue however sets about this report with a profound scepticism and a deft and witty touch; his commentary, in which he predicts that the report will merely make of schools and universities "a breeding ground for quarrelsome bores," is almost unfailingly quotable. He dismantles the doubletalk that endows such terms as 'neutrality,' activity,' and 'deference' with quite arbitrary merits and demerits, and castigates the report for its blindness to what it is feasible to teach and what is not. The context of his remarks is the current political scene in Great Britain; but their applicability to the proper treatment of cant in higher education, like the incidence of that phenomenon itself, is universal.Downloads
Published
1980-01-01
How to Cite
Minogue, K. (1980). CAN ONE TEACH "POLITICAL LITERACY"?. McGill Journal of Education / Revue Des Sciences De l’éducation De McGill, 15(001). Retrieved from https://mje.mcgill.ca/article/view/7311
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Those wishing to reproduce all or part of any material published on this website are asked to email mje.education@mcgill.ca for permission and to acknowledge the McGill Journal of Education as the original source.
Authors must transfer copyright of their article to MJE. Authors may use all or parts of their work in any future publication with the article's origin in MJE acknowledged in the customary manner.
A copy of our standard form may be requested from mje.education@mcgill.ca